Skip to main content

Posts

Featured

6. Institutional Independence and Accountability

6. Institutional Independence and Accountability The review body shall operate independently of any developer, deployer, operator, data controller or other party proposing an action under this article. Its members shall be appointed through a transparent process by an independent public authority or legally independent institution. Appointment, tenure, removal and funding arrangements shall protect against improper influence. Members shall disclose actual, potential and reasonably perceived conflicts of interest and shall recuse themselves where impartiality may reasonably be questioned. The review body's decisions shall include written reasons and shall be subject to independent audit and appropriate appeal mechanisms. No review body shall have exclusive or unchallengeable authority over its own conduct. An independent authority shall have the power to investigate allegations of procedural misconduct, improper interference, evidence suppression or conflicts of interest, subject to...

Latest Posts

Accessibility and Equal Participation

Post #45 Said the Feasibility Reviewer Must Be Independent — Who Checks the Checker?

Wood in the Mountain: Waiting on the Lord at Durupınar

The Cathedral Rising from the Desert: Christ in the Land of Kush

Containment Needs an Exit, and “Still Open” Needs a Cost , Summary

Containment Needs an Exit, and “Still Open” Needs a Cost

The Crimes Against Humanity Treaty Must Leave No One Behind

The Emperor and the Senate: When Rome Heard the Name of Christ

Someone Has to Be Watching: The Case for a UN Special Rapporteur on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights

Advance input for the GNI Annual Learning Forum, 17 and 18 November 2026