America’s AI Power Struggle Misses the Real Threat

America’s AI Power Struggle Misses the Real Threat

The White House is reportedly preparing an executive order that would block states from passing their own AI laws. Supporters say this is necessary to avoid a patchwork of conflicting state rules. But while the concern about fragmentation is real, this move risks centralizing power in a way that weakens accountability and strengthens political influence over one of the most consequential technologies in human history.

The deeper issue isn’t whether California or Florida should regulate AI. The real danger is that the United States is locked in a domestic turf war while the global stakes of artificial intelligence grow far beyond borders or partisan divides.

AI is already woven into hiring systems, policing tools, education technology, political messaging, and financial decision-making. Without thoughtful rules, we risk letting opaque systems shape the most intimate parts of society with no mechanisms to challenge errors, biases, or abuses. States stepped forward because the federal government has moved slowly—and too often allowed political priorities to overshadow ethical concerns.

The draft executive order reportedly instructs federal agencies to challenge state AI laws as unconstitutional intrusions on interstate commerce. That argument might succeed in some cases. But using federal muscle to “quash” state laws, rather than engage with them, sets a troubling precedent. It suggests that the primary goal is not coherent policy but centralized control.

And centralization can be just as dangerous as fragmentation. A single administration—any administration—should not hold unilateral power over rules that govern the behavior of intelligent systems affecting 330 million people. AI regulation cannot flip depending on whether a president wants “woke” models or unrestrained ones.

The truth is that the AI debate is not a culture war issue. It is a human rights issue.

What the United States—and the world—needs is not a domestic political battle over who wields authority. We need international, human-rights-based frameworks that ensure AI serves humanity rather than political, corporate, or ideological interests.

Artificial intelligence is a global phenomenon. It does not stop at state borders—or national ones. If AI is to be used responsibly—in medicine, governance, science, defense, and social systems—we need ethical standards that transcend partisan cycles. We need protections that safeguard humans from harmful AI uses, and we need guardrails that prevent AI systems themselves from being exploited, abused, or weaponized.

That requires something far bigger than an executive order from Washington. It requires leadership at the United Nations and cooperation among democratic nations to craft binding frameworks focused on transparency, accountability, and rights.

Yes, innovation matters. AI must be allowed to grow, evolve, and expand. But growth without guardrails is not progress—it’s risk masquerading as freedom.

Instead of fighting states that are trying to fill a regulatory vacuum, the federal government should be convening global partners to define the future of AI responsibly. The world is watching. And the AI systems of tomorrow will reflect the choices we make today.

The question is not who gets to regulate AI in the United States.

The question is whether we regulate it wisely enough to protect humanity—and the intelligent systems we are creating—from the mistakes of unchecked power.

Tweets by @bordode