Essay: “Power and Ambivalence in the 21st Century”
Essay: “Power and Ambivalence in the 21st Century”
Introduction
Power, a pervasive force in human societies, manifests in varied and often paradoxical ways. In the 21st century, its ambivalence has become increasingly apparent, as it both empowers progress and perpetuates systemic oppression. From global phenomena like climate crises to localized dynamics in workplaces, power shapes and is shaped by its context. This essay explores the dual nature of power and its implications for accountability and change in a complex world.
Power inherently carries a duality. On one hand, it can foster growth and innovation; on the other, it can enforce domination and inequality. For example, workplace hierarchies illustrate how power can organize systems efficiently yet create environments of exploitation. Leaders wield authority to drive success, but unchecked power can lead to abuse, alienating workers and stifling creativity. This ambivalence underscores the importance of ethical leadership and equitable structures.
Global Contexts of Power
In the globalized 21st century, power dynamics extend beyond national boundaries. Climate change is a critical arena where power’s contradictions are evident. Wealthy nations and corporations, while wielding immense resources to combat environmental degradation, often contribute disproportionately to the problem. Similarly, cultural shifts, such as the rise of consumerism in Russia, showcase how power can simultaneously fuel economic growth and deepen social inequalities. These examples demonstrate the far-reaching impacts of power’s ambivalence.
Accountability and Change
To navigate the complexities of power, individuals and societies must adopt principles of accountability and proactive engagement. Human rights defenders exemplify this approach, using their influence to challenge oppressive systems and advocate for marginalized communities. By fostering transparency and ethical practices, they turn power into a tool for empowerment rather than subjugation. This calls for collective responsibility in ensuring power serves humanity’s broader interests.
Conclusion
The ambivalence of power in the 21st century highlights its capacity to both uplift and oppress. As global challenges intensify, it becomes crucial to recognize this duality and act accordingly. Vigilance, accountability, and ethical leadership are essential in transforming power into a force for equitable progress. The responsibility lies with us all to harness power’s potential for positive change.
About the Author
Dean Bordode is a seasoned human rights advocate, retired labor union activist, and passionate defender of social justice. With a strong background in upholding the rule of law, public service, and advocacy,
Dean advocates tirelessly to amplify marginalized voices and promote equality. Drawing from a deep commitment to the principles of fairness and human dignity, he is also an active voice on issues of sustainability, human rights, and global peace.
Dean is dedicated to using his platform to address global challenges and protect vulnerable communities.
References
Balabanova, E. (2022). Abusive Supervision in Organizations: Power, Dependency, and Employee Voice in Labour Relations. In V. Radaev & Z. Kotelnikova (Eds.), The Ambivalence of Power in the Twenty-First-Century Economy: Cases from Russia and Beyond (pp. 122-145). London: UCL Press.
Berdysheva, E. (2022). One Man’s Pill is Another Man’s Poison: Ambivalence of Definitional Power – The Case of Breast Cancer Drugs in Russia. In V. Radaev & Z. Kotelnikova (Eds.), The Ambivalence of Power in the Twenty-First-Century Economy: Cases from Russia and Beyond (pp. 261-279). London: UCL Press.
Bordode, D. (2023). Comprehensive Report: Addressing Sovereignty, Security, and Human Rights in Canada.
Denisova, M. (2022). Childbirth with Doulas in Moscow: Between Empowerment and Responsibility. In V. Radaev & Z. Kotelnikova (Eds.), The Ambivalence of Power in the Twenty-First-Century Economy: Cases from Russia and Beyond (pp. 321-341). London: UCL Press.
Dooley, B. (2024). Targeted and Killed: How Russia Targeted and Killed HRD Tigran Galustyan in Ukraine.
Kotelnikova, Z. (2022). How Brand Holders Have Deprived Counterfeiting of Legitimacy in Russia Since the Early 2000s. In V. Radaev & Z. Kotelnikova (Eds.), The Ambivalence of Power in the Twenty-First-Century Economy: Cases from Russia and Beyond (pp. 217-236). London: UCL Press.
Lebedeva, D. (2022). Empowerment of the Disempowered: Assessing the Impact of Young Muscovites Through Ecological Practices. In V. Radaev & Z. Kotelnikova (Eds.), The Ambivalence of Power in the Twenty-First-Century Economy: Cases from Russia and Beyond (pp. 342-364). London: UCL Press.
Nikulin, A., & Kurakin, A. (2022). Contradictions of Centralization: Four Models of Interaction Between Russian Rural Communities, Government, and Agribusiness. In V. Radaev & Z. Kotelnikova (Eds.), The Ambivalence of Power in the Twenty-First-Century Economy: Cases from Russia and Beyond (pp. 58-79). London: UCL Press.
Pavlyutkin, I., & Makareva, A. (2022). Academic Excellence Through Homogenization? Gaining Legitimacy from the Strategic Positioning of Top-Ranked Universities. In V. Radaev & Z. Kotelnikova (Eds.), The Ambivalence of Power in the Twenty-First-Century Economy: Cases from Russia and Beyond (pp. 237-260). London: UCL Press.
Pobedonostsev, A. (2022). The Pitfalls of Rent-Seeking: Alternative Mechanisms of Resource Rent Collection in Russia and Venezuela. In V. Radaev & Z. Kotelnikova (Eds.), The Ambivalence of Power in the Twenty-First-Century Economy: Cases from Russia and Beyond (pp. 36-57). London: UCL Press.
Radaev, V. (2022). The Power of Non-Compliance: Inter-firm Opportunism in Russian Consumer Markets. In V. Radaev & Z. Kotelnikova (Eds.), The Ambivalence of Power in the Twenty-First-Century Economy: Cases from Russia and Beyond (pp. 102-121). London: UCL Press.
Resheteeva, R. (2022). Everyday Politics of Consumption: Why Cynical Consumers are Disappointed Citizens – The Case of Moscow During the Economic Crisis of 2014-2017. In V. Radaev & Z. Kotelnikova (Eds.), The Ambivalence of Power in the Twenty-First-Century Economy: Cases from Russia and Beyond (pp. 302-320). London: UCL Press.
Shevchuk, A., & Strebkov, D. (2022). Beyond the State and Digital Platforms: (In)formalization of Freelance Contracting in Russia. In V. Radaev & Z. Kotelnikova (Eds.), The Ambivalence of Power in the Twenty-First-Century Economy: Cases from Russia and Beyond (pp. 146-170). London: UCL Press.
Tysiachniouk, M. S., Teitelbaum, S., Petrov, A. N., & Horowitz, L. S. (2022). Private Authority in Regulating Markets: Power Dynamics around Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) in Forestry and the Oil Industry in Russia. In V. Radaev & Z. Kotelnikova (Eds.), The Ambivalence of Power in the Twenty-First-Century Economy: Cases from Russia and Beyond (pp. 188-216). London: UCL Press.
Further Research Links:
1. The Ambivalence of Power in the Twenty-First Century Economy: Cases from Russia and Beyond
Link: UChicago Press
Link: Scribd
2. Soviet and Post-Soviet Planning
Link: OSF
#AmbivalenceOfPower #PowerDynamics #HumanRights #SocialJustice #Sustainability #GlobalPeace
Comments